330,000 make A-level grades

Share Now

More candidates who sat the 2022 Uganda Certificate of Education (UCE) have passed the examinations and qualified to join Advanced Level (A-Level) compared to their counterparts who sat  similar examinations in 2020.

Releasing the results yesterday at State House in Nakasero, Mr Dan Odongo— the Executive Director of the Uganda National Examination Board (Uneb)—revealed that 345,695 candidates sat for the examinations, out of 349,459 who had registered. Of these, 46,667 (13.5 percent) passed in Division One compared to 36,968 (12.1 percent) who were in the same grade in 2020.

The students that passed in the Second Division were 76,745 (22.2 percent) this time around compared to 67,782 (21.2 percent). Elsewhere, students that passed in Third Division were 88,690 (25.7 percent) compared to 81,248 (24.7 percent) in 2020. Those in Division Four were 117,837 (34 percent) compared to 120,055 (36.4 percent) in 2020.

If there are common points between 2022 and 2020, it is that most of the students passed in Division Four. The students who passed in Division Four will not be able to get placements in the good schools that usually reject students who have not been able to obtain either first, second or third division. These tend to end up in vocational and technical institutions.

According to the Education minister, Ms Janet Kataha Museveni, Senior Five selection of the candidates who have passed is slated to run from February 23 to 24. The Senior Five students will report on March 6, with 329,939 cleared to join A-Level. A total of 15,756 (4.6 percent) failed the examinations in 2022 compared to 18,415 (5.6 percent) who were ungraded in the 2020 examinations.

“There was better performance in the 2022 examinations. The failure rate has also dropped by 1.0 percent, ” Mr Odongo said yesterday at the release of the examinations.

In terms of gender, male candidates outperformed their female counterparts. Of 345,695 candidates who sat for the examinations 173,761 were male and 171,934 were female.  About 15.5 percent of boys passed in Division One compared to 11.5 females, 23.3 percent of boys passed in Division Two compared to 21.0 percent females, 25.5 percent of boys passed in Division Three compared to 25.8 percent of females, while 31.4 percent of boys passed in Division Four compared to 37.0 percent of girls. When it comes to failure, 4.3 percent of boys failed compared to 4.7 percent of females.

Mr Odongo said female candidates performed better than their male counterparts in English Language, while the boys performed better in Chemistry.

Whereas boys performed better than their female counterparts, performance across the divisions was relatively the same for both males and females.

Candidates increase

The number of candidates who sat the 2022 examinations increased by 16,063 (4.8 percent) from 333,396 in 2020 to 349,459. This reverses the decrease of 4,324 (-1.3 percent) that had been witnessed in the previous examination. The candidates sat from 3,703 centres.

Ms Museveni was pleased to learn that the candidature that had declined in 2020 has now picked up and surpassed the previous numbers by 4.8 percent. She was also pleased that the country is overcoming the problem of having closed schools for two years and other Covid-19 effects.

However, whereas the number of candidates who registered for the UCE examinations increased, absenteeism was high after 3,764 candidates who registered for the exams did not turn up.

“It is not right for students to study for four years, register for the examinations only to miss out at the end thus losing out on transitioning to the next level of their education,” Ms Museveni said of the cases of absenteeism that increased by 0.3 percent.

Performance by subjects

Elsewhere, there is an improvement in performance in the large entry subjects except in Christian Religious Education, Biology and Commerce.

Mathematics showed better performance at the Distinction level, but declined overall. English Language improved at credit and overall Pass levels, but declined at the Distinction level.

Performance in Biology has continued to decline as seen in the last few years. Whereas performance in Physics and Chemistry has improved, the overall pass levels are still low. In fact, over 40 percent of the candidates have not passed the two subjects.

Language deficiency

Uneb noted that this year examiners reported better quality work in English Language. However, in composition writing, where candidates are expected to exhibit creativity and originality, learners in some schools are still cramming passages from textbooks or what they call “model compositions” with unusual and difficult vocabulary. They then reproduce the crammed passages irrespective of what the composition topic is.

According to Mr Odongo, the challenge of language deficiency is reflected in performance in other subjects where chief examiners continue to report failure by the candidates to interpret the demands of the tasks set, failure to follow instructions, misunderstanding key words used in the stem of a question, and generally poor language expression.

Performance in Science practical

Mr Odongo also revealed that the problems in sciences have remained the same as in recent years. The weaknesses were also shown in making and recording observations and drawing conclusions from those observations; tabulation of experimental results and interpretation of the results to meet the demands of the question, according to the board’s executive director.

“They also showed poor mathematical skills required in calculations, inability to write the correct symbols of elements, formulae of compounds and equations,” Mr Odongo noted.

He added that a lot of candidates showed lack of practical experience in handling the apparatus, attributing most malpractice cases to Science practical papers on this.

Mr Odongo said candidates do better in questions which require mainly knowledge and understanding (Low Order questions). Higher Order questions, which require candidates to apply knowledge in problem solving situations, draw inferences or make predictions from observations or a set of data are not done well.


It was revealed that candidates do better in questions which require mainly knowledge and understanding (Low Order questions). Higher Order questions, which require candidates to apply knowledge in problem solving situations, draw inferences or make predictions from observations or a set of data are not done well.

Source: Monitor


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | CoverNews by AF themes.